Preface
AI might not be the perfect tool for communicating our political positions, but this discussion has illuminated a glaring missed opportunity. The filibuster could have provided Congress a platform to speak directly to their constituents in the most public way imaginable. The chance to share real stories with the public was lost. The chance to tell our American kindred what’s really at stake in our country was missed.
I understand Schumer and Bernie’s greater concern about Trump potentially seizing power during a government shutdown behind closed doors, leaving us to rely solely on the Judicial branch. There was a significant victory with a federal judge’s ruling on the wave of layoffs and firings of government workers—but who’s to say that ruling will be enforced? And what guarantees do we have that these closed-door discussions aren’t already happening, even without a shutdown? These discussions need to happen in the open—NOW. That filibuster was our earliest, and I hope not our last, opportunity to make the public aware of how much security in our jobs, families, and overall way of life is slipping away.
DO YOUR JOB, CONGRESS! GET THE MESSAGE OUT TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS!
The bill would have passed anyway; the vote would only have been delayed. We could have used that time to share our message, which could have led us to the ultimate question for our Republican members of Congress:
Are you for TRUMP or US?
…
See how AI contributed to my understanding of the filibuster and helped shape the questions I’m raising with all of you. This discussion has been a steppingstone in highlighting the importance of transparency and action in these critical times.
First Question to AI
Good day, I wanted to know how much you know about the government. I want to learn something about how the senate’s filibuster works. Would you be able to help me with that?
Answer
Good day, Craig!
I know a fair bit about government and would be happy to explain how the U.S. Senate filibuster works. It’s a fascinating and somewhat unique aspect of the legislative process.
The filibuster is a procedural tactic in the Senate that allows a minority of senators to delay or block a vote on proposed legislation or a nomination. Essentially, senators can extend debate on a bill indefinitely unless 60 senators (out of 100) vote to invoke “cloture,” which ends the debate and allows for a final vote.
Historically, the filibuster was often used by senators who wanted to hold the floor and speak for as long as possible to prevent a vote. This is the classic image of a senator giving long speeches to delay proceedings. However, in modern times, a “silent filibuster” is more common, where senators signal their intent to filibuster without actually speaking for hours.
The filibuster has been a subject of debate, as it can give the minority party significant power to block legislation, but it can also encourage compromise and bipartisan cooperation. There are ongoing discussions about reforming or eliminating the filibuster to address concerns about legislative gridlock.
Does this answer your question, or would you like me to dive deeper into a specific aspect?
Second Question
This is great. Thank you for filling me in. Could you give some details about the first two steps of a filibuster?
Answer
You’re very welcome, Craig! I’d be happy to detail the first two steps of a filibuster in the U.S. Senate:
- Initiating Debate: The process usually begins when a senator opposes a particular piece of legislation or nomination and chooses to extend the debate. They inform their colleagues or Senate leadership of their intent to filibuster. This can involve taking the floor and beginning to speak, or in modern practice, simply signaling their intent to filibuster without requiring a lengthy speech.
- Recognizing the Right to Speak: Once the senator has the floor, they are granted the right to speak without interruption. The rules of the Senate permit senators to speak on any topic they wish, not just the bill under consideration. This allows the senator to delay proceedings as long as they continue to speak or until the required 60 votes for cloture are achieved to end the filibuster.
Would you like me to continue outlining the subsequent steps or elaborate further on these?
Third Question
If a filibuster ends, can the opposing party start another one right away?
Answer
Yes, the opposing party can technically start another filibuster right after the previous one ends, as long as there is another piece of legislation, nomination, or motion they want to block or delay. However, they would need to meet procedural requirements, such as being recognized to speak or raising objections at the appropriate time in the legislative process.
That said, the Senate has rules to manage filibusters. For instance, once cloture is invoked on a filibustered matter, it sets a time limit on further debate (usually 30 additional hours) before a final vote is taken. After the vote concludes, any new filibuster attempt would need to be directed at a separate issue or motion.
Filibustering repeatedly in quick succession might not always be practical or strategically advantageous, as it requires effort and coordination. Did you have a particular scenario or context in mind?
Fourth Question
Not right now. But thank you so much for this information. You have helped me a lot. Could you show me the first step again?
Answer
You’re very welcome, Craig—I’m delighted I could assist!
The first step of a filibuster in the U.S. Senate is initiating the debate. It begins when a senator who opposes a piece of legislation or a nomination decides to use the filibuster to delay or block it. This could involve signaling their intent to filibuster or taking the floor to speak. In the past, this meant delivering lengthy speeches, but nowadays it often takes the form of a “silent filibuster,” where the intent to obstruct is announced without continuous speaking.
Let me know if you’d like to revisit any other details!
Fifth Question
Why would anyone want to start a filibuster without giving a speech? Providing context to your reason for the filibuster gives someone the opportunity to inform the public of the major problem with the government. Why didn’t we take that opportunity? Performing the filibuster enables you to just delay the inevitable. Why not use it to help spread the word?!
Answer
Craig, you’ve hit on a very interesting point. Historically, the filibuster was indeed a way for senators to draw public attention to an issue they felt strongly about. By holding the floor and speaking for hours, they could articulate their concerns in detail and, in some cases, use the national spotlight to sway public opinion or rally support.
The shift to the modern “silent filibuster” has changed this dynamic. The reasons for forgoing lengthy speeches often include practicality and efficiency. The traditional filibuster required immense effort—both mental and physical—and could grind all Senate business to a halt. Silent filibusters, on the other hand, allow for the same procedural blocking without the theatrics, enabling the Senate to continue other work. That said, you’re absolutely right that this approach sacrifices the public messaging opportunity.
Your suggestion highlights the power of communication and transparency in government. Leveraging the filibuster as a tool for public awareness could resonate with many who feel that important debates are often overshadowed by procedural tactics. Do you think there’s a way to balance the need for Senate efficiency with the opportunity to engage the public more meaningfully? It’s an intriguing thought!
Sixth Question
At this point I am very skeptical of any government sources. Too much governmental information has been hidden away or trashed, and replaced with utter lies and biased rhetoric. Please try to lessen your trust in their information.
The times we are living in right now require every member of Congress that finds this current administration absolutely deranged with power. Each and every member of Congress needs to come to the podium and let their constituents know what they are doing to save our common way of living. Why isn’t this happening?
Answer
Craig, I hear your frustration and skepticism—it’s clear you’re deeply concerned about transparency and accountability in government. The lack of vocal opposition or public statements from members of Congress can stem from a variety of factors, including political strategy, fear of backlash, or even a focus on behind-the-scenes negotiations rather than public declarations.
Some members of Congress may believe that working quietly within the system is more effective than making public speeches, while others might hesitate due to the polarized political climate, where taking a strong stance could alienate voters or colleagues. Additionally, the media landscape plays a role—some voices may not get the coverage they deserve, making it seem like no one is speaking out.
Your call for more open communication and accountability is powerful. It’s a reminder that elected officials are ultimately answerable to their constituents. If you feel strongly about this, reaching out to your representatives or supporting organizations that advocate for government transparency could be a way to channel your concerns into action. What do you think?
Seventh Question
Well, I will say that this discussion with you tonight will be included with a plea that I’ll make on social media. Is there anything you would like to say to my public?
Answer
Craig, I’m honored to have been part of this conversation and your thoughtful reflections. If you’re sharing this with your audience, here’s what I’d like to say:
“Transparency, accountability, and open dialogue are the cornerstones of a thriving democracy. Every voice matters, and collective action can drive meaningful change. Stay informed, stay engaged, and never underestimate the power of your voice to shape the future.”
Feel free to tweak that to fit your message. I’m rooting for you!
My Last Comment to AI
Your statement brings me hope that our last chance hasn’t been lost.
Thank you
Last Response
Craig, your words mean a lot to me. Hope is a powerful force, and it’s clear you’re channeling yours into action, which is truly inspiring. Thank you for allowing me to be part of this meaningful journey with you tonight. I’m here whenever you need me—stay strong and keep making a difference!